Subrreal Versus Subrealism in Contemporary Art
The birth of psychoanalysis gave rise to a vast movement of thought that constituted a true revolution in the ambit of 20th century modernism. Like the Bolshevik revolution, which through class struggle transformed the perception of the social role of the masses, the psychoanalytical revolution also had great influence on the culture and customs of the 20th century and continues to influence in this day and age.
The collective awareness of the role played by the unconscious in the daily life of an individual and the influence exerted by Freud鈥檚 The Interpretation of Dreams was already in the first half of the 20th century the major reference point for the Surrealists, who in turn influenced the art of the decades that followed. The turning point occurred around the end of the 1970s, as a result of the initial effects of the social changes caused by the telematic revolution. Shortly thereafter, the Internet, satellite TV, Photoshop, and new scientific discoveries would change our perception of reality.
It is in this context that Postmodernism and a global vision of the world became established. It is in this context, which saw in art 鈥 but not only art 鈥 the relationships between individuals of different cultures and geographic areas undergo enormous change, that Surrealism and its ramifications gave way to the Surreal.
That is if Surrealism offered images of oneiric visions, immediately perceived as improbable in the reality of everyday, the Surreal instead proposed real images that are hard to accept as true, to the point of being easily confused with oneiric or imaginary visions. Therefore, if Surrealism is the mirror of the individual鈥檚 upheavals of the unconscious, which are projected into reality as a work of art, the Surreal is the mirror of reality that is projected into the unconscious of the individual, causing upheavals. In this sense, Surreal versus Surrealism in Contemporary Art focuses in particular on images showing unreal situations that at first glance are perceived as real and on true situations, on the contrary, that are perceived as a figment of one鈥檚 imagination.
Surreal versus Surrealism in Contemporary Art, curated by Gianni Mercurio and Demetrio Paparoni for the IVAM in Valencia, addresses this important aspect of today鈥檚 art for the first time. The exhibition shows that while the surrealistic concepts that developed from the early 1920s are still in the works of several important artists of today, many others have developed an aesthetic concept influenced by the languages of the telematic tools for the masses.
The exhibition uses the term 鈥淪urreal鈥 as opposed to 鈥淪urrealism鈥 for the first time, thus giving rise to the formulation of an original critique.
Recommended for you
The birth of psychoanalysis gave rise to a vast movement of thought that constituted a true revolution in the ambit of 20th century modernism. Like the Bolshevik revolution, which through class struggle transformed the perception of the social role of the masses, the psychoanalytical revolution also had great influence on the culture and customs of the 20th century and continues to influence in this day and age.
The collective awareness of the role played by the unconscious in the daily life of an individual and the influence exerted by Freud鈥檚 The Interpretation of Dreams was already in the first half of the 20th century the major reference point for the Surrealists, who in turn influenced the art of the decades that followed. The turning point occurred around the end of the 1970s, as a result of the initial effects of the social changes caused by the telematic revolution. Shortly thereafter, the Internet, satellite TV, Photoshop, and new scientific discoveries would change our perception of reality.
It is in this context that Postmodernism and a global vision of the world became established. It is in this context, which saw in art 鈥 but not only art 鈥 the relationships between individuals of different cultures and geographic areas undergo enormous change, that Surrealism and its ramifications gave way to the Surreal.
That is if Surrealism offered images of oneiric visions, immediately perceived as improbable in the reality of everyday, the Surreal instead proposed real images that are hard to accept as true, to the point of being easily confused with oneiric or imaginary visions. Therefore, if Surrealism is the mirror of the individual鈥檚 upheavals of the unconscious, which are projected into reality as a work of art, the Surreal is the mirror of reality that is projected into the unconscious of the individual, causing upheavals. In this sense, Surreal versus Surrealism in Contemporary Art focuses in particular on images showing unreal situations that at first glance are perceived as real and on true situations, on the contrary, that are perceived as a figment of one鈥檚 imagination.
Surreal versus Surrealism in Contemporary Art, curated by Gianni Mercurio and Demetrio Paparoni for the IVAM in Valencia, addresses this important aspect of today鈥檚 art for the first time. The exhibition shows that while the surrealistic concepts that developed from the early 1920s are still in the works of several important artists of today, many others have developed an aesthetic concept influenced by the languages of the telematic tools for the masses.
The exhibition uses the term 鈥淪urreal鈥 as opposed to 鈥淪urrealism鈥 for the first time, thus giving rise to the formulation of an original critique.
Artists on show
- Carsten Höller
- Dionisio González
- Douglas Gordon
- Francesco Clemente
- Francesco Gennari
- Hans op de Beeck
- John Bock
- Li Tianbing
- Matthew Barney
- Maurizio Cattelan
- Michael Joo
- Monica Bonvicini
- Nathalie Djurberg
- Peter Halley
- Robert Gober
- Roberto Cuoghi
- Ross Bleckner
- Shirazeh Houshiary
- Timothy Greenfield-Sanders