黑料不打烊


ATOPIA: Art and City in the 21st Century

25 Feb, 2010 - 24 May, 2010
The exhibition explores a kind of unease鈥攖he awkwardness that exists between the city and the individual. The tension between a city that becomes individual (taking on a life of its own, over and above nations, countries or states) and an individual it treats like an object. Between them, the two form a kind of atopia. We know that utopias did not exist, but they did offer paradises elsewhere, away from the danger of the world鈥檚 present.

Atopia is the feeling of unease experienced by the individual faced with a city that does exist, but which in no case represents the paradise dreamt-of or promised, for the simple reason that the monster that is now the city has taken on a life of its own.

The exhibition 鈥淎topia鈥 is not one of the recent projects to be based on the social phenomenon, nor is it one of the increasing number of projects to denounce issues such as urban speculation or gentrification in cities. It focuses instead on a more universal and also more palpable agony: that of the individual who survives and what might be termed his existential resistance to the urban apotheosis.

Without prior judgment or prejudice, and always by means of artistic discourses, 鈥淎topia鈥 explores the city that is relinquishing its former functions鈥攖he functions of modern life鈥攁nd starting to be something else. A kind of Moby Dick that breaks away from past representations and belonging to situate itself in a subsequent dimension.

The city as a space of congregation and work has given way to the city as a place of atomization and leisure (or unemployment); the space which until very recently functioned as a fantasy of encounter and realization is being transformed before our eyes into a place of loss and failure; the concrete city鈥擯aris, Rome, Berlin, Chicago鈥攊s losing its sharp outline and giving way to the abstract city. At the same time, Utopian cities鈥攖hose of More and Erasmus, Bacon and Campanella鈥攏o longer serve as a basis for the urbanization of the global city, because the latter has set itself up beyond the horizon of the things we dream of, where it floats like a freestanding platform, tracing the drift of its own wreckage.

The exhibition explores a kind of unease鈥攖he awkwardness that exists between the city and the individual. The tension between a city that becomes individual (taking on a life of its own, over and above nations, countries or states) and an individual it treats like an object. Between them, the two form a kind of atopia. We know that utopias did not exist, but they did offer paradises elsewhere, away from the danger of the world鈥檚 present.

Atopia is the feeling of unease experienced by the individual faced with a city that does exist, but which in no case represents the paradise dreamt-of or promised, for the simple reason that the monster that is now the city has taken on a life of its own.

The exhibition 鈥淎topia鈥 is not one of the recent projects to be based on the social phenomenon, nor is it one of the increasing number of projects to denounce issues such as urban speculation or gentrification in cities. It focuses instead on a more universal and also more palpable agony: that of the individual who survives and what might be termed his existential resistance to the urban apotheosis.

Without prior judgment or prejudice, and always by means of artistic discourses, 鈥淎topia鈥 explores the city that is relinquishing its former functions鈥攖he functions of modern life鈥攁nd starting to be something else. A kind of Moby Dick that breaks away from past representations and belonging to situate itself in a subsequent dimension.

The city as a space of congregation and work has given way to the city as a place of atomization and leisure (or unemployment); the space which until very recently functioned as a fantasy of encounter and realization is being transformed before our eyes into a place of loss and failure; the concrete city鈥擯aris, Rome, Berlin, Chicago鈥攊s losing its sharp outline and giving way to the abstract city. At the same time, Utopian cities鈥攖hose of More and Erasmus, Bacon and Campanella鈥攏o longer serve as a basis for the urbanization of the global city, because the latter has set itself up beyond the horizon of the things we dream of, where it floats like a freestanding platform, tracing the drift of its own wreckage.

Contact details

Carrer de Montalegre 5 Barcelona, Spain 08001
Sign in to 黑料不打烊.com