Detlef Orlopp
The face both reveals and conceals something. Detlef Orlopp (*1937 in Elbing, West Prussia) started his large-format photographic series of facial studies in the 1960s. Comparable to his works of lakes and mountain slopes, we are looking at an objective cartography of human, and primarily female, facial traits. In these timeless, analogue, black-and-white photos, the artist not only avoids any sense of proportio divina but also of adopting a godlike perspective. The serial recording of the earth鈥檚 surface develops parallel to the recording of human physiognomies, which evoke a sense of wonder about how every diverse detail can turn into something typical. The viewer senses the misconception that the face reflects the individual鈥檚 authenticity 鈥 on the contrary, here the face becomes the arena of a self in which history is mirrored.
The face only 鈥渢urns into a face when it comes into contact with other faces, when it looks at them or is looked at in return,鈥 writes Hans Belting. In Orlopp鈥檚 portraits, we therefore see faces in the process of being looked at. They do not show the 鈥渘atural鈥 in the sense of the naturalistic, according to John Anthony Thwaites, but rather the human countenance as a symbol. The snapshot is part of the very 鈥渘ature鈥 of photography, yet Orlopp steeps these moments in a period of seeing and being-seen 鈥 a silence, as Orlopp would say. In these facial traits, we seem to find the same dignity and quietude of his photographs of mountain slopes 鈥 not, however, as the mirror of the portrayed person鈥檚 soul, but as a site reflecting the elementary ambiguousness of the face, of man and of nature.
Recommended for you
The face both reveals and conceals something. Detlef Orlopp (*1937 in Elbing, West Prussia) started his large-format photographic series of facial studies in the 1960s. Comparable to his works of lakes and mountain slopes, we are looking at an objective cartography of human, and primarily female, facial traits. In these timeless, analogue, black-and-white photos, the artist not only avoids any sense of proportio divina but also of adopting a godlike perspective. The serial recording of the earth鈥檚 surface develops parallel to the recording of human physiognomies, which evoke a sense of wonder about how every diverse detail can turn into something typical. The viewer senses the misconception that the face reflects the individual鈥檚 authenticity 鈥 on the contrary, here the face becomes the arena of a self in which history is mirrored.
The face only 鈥渢urns into a face when it comes into contact with other faces, when it looks at them or is looked at in return,鈥 writes Hans Belting. In Orlopp鈥檚 portraits, we therefore see faces in the process of being looked at. They do not show the 鈥渘atural鈥 in the sense of the naturalistic, according to John Anthony Thwaites, but rather the human countenance as a symbol. The snapshot is part of the very 鈥渘ature鈥 of photography, yet Orlopp steeps these moments in a period of seeing and being-seen 鈥 a silence, as Orlopp would say. In these facial traits, we seem to find the same dignity and quietude of his photographs of mountain slopes 鈥 not, however, as the mirror of the portrayed person鈥檚 soul, but as a site reflecting the elementary ambiguousness of the face, of man and of nature.
Artists on show
Contact details